Just another WordPress.com weblog


(kuis 4)

1.What specific client-related matters prompted Goldstein and Morris’s decision to conceal certain information from the PCAOB?

The specific clients are New York Film Works, Inc. (“NYFW”) and RTG Ventures, Inc.

(“RTG”).The GM CPAs  were trying to formulate and carry out a plan to create and back date certain documents and place them in the firm’s audit files before inspections review the files. Because the GM CPAs had failed to comply with certain PCAOB standards in connection with the preparations and issuances of audit reports for NYFW and RTG.

2.What sanctions were imposed on the firm, the managing partner, and the two other partners involved in the investigation? Were these sanctions fair?

The sanctions By this Order, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“Board” or

“PCAOB”) is revoking the registration of Goldstein and Morris CPAs, P.C., and barring Edward B. Morris from being an associated person of a registered public accounting firm. To me that was fair because the board was trying to protect the investor and public interest and also the prevent another case that would happen like that again.


Comments on: "Audting and Assurance ( internet problems )" (1)

  1. Hey I just saw a website Telonu where you can read and write reviews about RTG Ventures Inc anonymously at http://www.telonu.com/reviews/rtg-ventures-inc.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: